총 44페이지
32페이지 본문시작
Cover Story
3.ThoroughTraumaTreatment
In 2019, as ASF broke out in Gyeonggi and Gangwon Provinces, stamping-out cases increased, and the psychological
support to the workers began to materialize. According to the 2020 project report from National Center for Disaster and
Trauma, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs revised the guidelines for emergency operation procedures
against livestock epidemics from 2019 to 2020 by adding information on “Psychological support for participants such as
stamping-outpolicy.”Thecontentsincludetheimplementationof“TraumaPreventionandSafetyEducationofParticipants
inStamping-outpolicyandCarcassDisposal,”andothermeasures.Localgovernmentshavealsoemergedtodesignatetheir
own bylaws for personnel participating in the stamping-out policy. A bylaw of Gyeonggi Province passed the Health and
Welfare Committee on February 18, 2020, to support the prevention and treatment of psychological trauma for personnel
participatinginthestamping-outpolicy.
Professor Lee said, “There are measures being arranged, but actually, there are no measures to cope with post-
traumatic stress yet. Regarding the stamping-out policy, continuous treatment counseling for PTSD should be established
nationwide.” According to an interview with Hankyoreh and lawyer Ha Seung-soo, who participated in a constitutional
complaint, “The factory-style livestock industry is unconstitutional,” said in 2013. He also said, “As the stamping-out
policy is carried out in a hurry, humane regulations are hard to follow. You can’t hope for every rule to be strictly kept
when the worker is working in a bad environment and labor conditions. For this reason, the government should not leave
the trauma of stamping-out workers up to individual discretion. They should be responsible for direct treatment for the
workers.” The government should take responsibility for the treatment of the trauma of stamping-out policy workers and
comeupwithsystematicpost-traumaticstressmeasuresassoonaspossible.
Why do livestock get killed through the stamping-out policy, even the healthy
ones, while humans make numerous efforts, such as developing vaccines when
there is an infectious disease? The situation of humans developing vaccines to
cure their diseases and animals that are killed after living their whole life in a
ⓒecoview
dense space seems so different. All living things are equal in the face of viral
infections. There is no being that deserves to be buried alive in the ground
for prevention against disease. The stamping-out policy should face criticism
because it is a policy that depreciates life and considers only administrative
concerns.Thereisaneedforanewpolicywithenvironmentalconsiderationsto
saveanimalsfromthethreatofviruses.
▲No more animals should be buried
wedae20@hufs.ac.kr
alive in the ground for prevention
againstdisease.
30
www.theargus.org
3.ThoroughTraumaTreatment
In 2019, as ASF broke out in Gyeonggi and Gangwon Provinces, stamping-out cases increased, and the psychological
support to the workers began to materialize. According to the 2020 project report from National Center for Disaster and
Trauma, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs revised the guidelines for emergency operation procedures
against livestock epidemics from 2019 to 2020 by adding information on “Psychological support for participants such as
stamping-outpolicy.”Thecontentsincludetheimplementationof“TraumaPreventionandSafetyEducationofParticipants
inStamping-outpolicyandCarcassDisposal,”andothermeasures.Localgovernmentshavealsoemergedtodesignatetheir
own bylaws for personnel participating in the stamping-out policy. A bylaw of Gyeonggi Province passed the Health and
Welfare Committee on February 18, 2020, to support the prevention and treatment of psychological trauma for personnel
participatinginthestamping-outpolicy.
Professor Lee said, “There are measures being arranged, but actually, there are no measures to cope with post-
traumatic stress yet. Regarding the stamping-out policy, continuous treatment counseling for PTSD should be established
nationwide.” According to an interview with Hankyoreh and lawyer Ha Seung-soo, who participated in a constitutional
complaint, “The factory-style livestock industry is unconstitutional,” said in 2013. He also said, “As the stamping-out
policy is carried out in a hurry, humane regulations are hard to follow. You can’t hope for every rule to be strictly kept
when the worker is working in a bad environment and labor conditions. For this reason, the government should not leave
the trauma of stamping-out workers up to individual discretion. They should be responsible for direct treatment for the
workers.” The government should take responsibility for the treatment of the trauma of stamping-out policy workers and
comeupwithsystematicpost-traumaticstressmeasuresassoonaspossible.
Why do livestock get killed through the stamping-out policy, even the healthy
ones, while humans make numerous efforts, such as developing vaccines when
there is an infectious disease? The situation of humans developing vaccines to
cure their diseases and animals that are killed after living their whole life in a
ⓒecoview
dense space seems so different. All living things are equal in the face of viral
infections. There is no being that deserves to be buried alive in the ground
for prevention against disease. The stamping-out policy should face criticism
because it is a policy that depreciates life and considers only administrative
concerns.Thereisaneedforanewpolicywithenvironmentalconsiderationsto
saveanimalsfromthethreatofviruses.
▲No more animals should be buried
wedae20@hufs.ac.kr
alive in the ground for prevention
againstdisease.
30
www.theargus.org
32페이지 본문끝
메뉴
현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.