총 32페이지

24 In-depthonNational
Policy’arenecessary.”
to article three in the Fundamentals
RealSolutiontoHigh-priced
of Education Act, all citizens have
3.Effectivenessofuniversities’
Tuition
the right to study and receive an
self-efforts
education according to their ability
The easing plan of the
Unless reform is made, the chronic
and aptitude. Article four guarantees
government is not compulsory for
problems of universities, such as
the equal opportunity of education.
universities to follow, as it is only
saved money and irresponsible
No member of the public should be
a recommendation so chances are
educational foundations, will
discriminated against because of
that universities will not make any
continue and governmental action
their financial state. The government
self-efforts to reduce tuition fees.
will be ineffective unless it has
should furthermore take steps
“Thereisnowaytoforceuniversity’s
a large bankroll. Thus, unless
to reduce the gap of educational
participation if the schools decide
universities are reformed and a
conditions. In reality however, most
to give up governmental support
government bankroll of programs
nationshaveinfringedontheserights
or raise their tuitions under the
is provided at the same time, the
so as the government practices the
justification of improving their
problems of high-priced tuition
Half Price Tuition Policy, it will be
competitiveness. For the time being,
cannotbesolved.
protecting our rights. Ultimately, the
universities may reduce their tuition
government has to advance towards
owing to the negative atmosphere of
freeeducation.
1.Government-oriented
reorganization
society regarding universities. But
as time passes, there is possibility
▶How
that they will raise their tuition,”
The political communities, which
①Halfpricetuitionpolicy.
said the reporter Yeon. Professor
agree with the practice of the Half
▶Why
Ban also raises a question about
In the inadequate situation in
Price Tuition Policy, insist on the
the effectiveness of universities’
which the higher education fee
necessity to look for a source of
self-efforts. He said, “Whether
burden is mostly placed on private
revenue as part of adopting this
universities make self-efforts or not
individuals, only the government’s
subsidy. This will require allotting
completely depends on the schools.
large bankroll can fundamentally
some parts of Korea’s internal tax
Iftheydonotmakeself-efforts,only
solvethehigh-pricedtuitionproblem.
revenuetosubsidizehighereducation.
thestudentswillbehurt.”
In addition, the public has a right to
This bill is not an increased taxation
Additionally, chances are that there
study and have an equal access to
bill and so needs to secure a
will be discrimination according
education. The government as well
budget. The Grand National Party-
to the situation of the universities.
has the obligation to protect these
Hanara(GNP) has already submitted
“There is a study showing that
rights of their citizens. According
a bill to subsidize the higher
incomelevelhasanimpactonschool
records. According to this study,
http://news.donga.com
chances are that the rich will go to
most prestigious universities, which
have money to spare, and the poor
go to freshwater colleges whose
financial conditions are not good.
In this situation, the government’s
easingplancannothelppoorstudents
because their universities often
Studentsshouldnotbe
cannot afford to make the self-
infringedtheirrightsto
efforts,”mentionedProfessorBan.
study
www.theargus.org

현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.