총 36페이지

22 CoverStory
Ju-jeomon
ⓒhttps://www.koraorganics.com
ByJoHe-rim
ReporterofCampusSection
Agree
University
KimSe-jin,EnglishLinguistics‘11
Goodor
Ju-jeomhaverecentlybeenbannedbytheUniversity.Itisamatterforthestudentstocontrol
and find solutions to problems that may have occurred. I agree that there should have been
somemeasurestakenaboutthenoiseandtrashproblemsbutIdonotthinkitisjustifiablefor
theuniversitytostopstudentsfromopeningju-jeom.Theyhavebeenaroundforalongtime
and have become one of the ways for students to build closer relationships with each other.
Forsomefreshmen,itisalsotheirfirsttimetohostaneventandcanmakegreatmemoriesfor
them.Ifthereisprofitmadefromju-jeom,themoneyhasalwaysbeenspentfortheacademic
departments and “Dongari,” or clubs. Those people who sing loud after drinking will do it
Doyouagreeordisagreeon
regardless of where they drink. Indeed, it is up to the students to make the environment for
openingJu-jeom
oncampus?
themselves.
There needs to be some measures made by students considering the noise and trash. What
Notsure
should be done is that ju-jeom should be kept but the students should voluntarily place
Agree
5.29%
restrictions on ju-jeom. Like the General Student Council of Seoul Campus(GSC) providing
Undergraduates
41.24%
(29)
548
(226)*
guidelinesforimprovement,placingrestrictionsinfrontofthelibraryandthedormitorycan
beastart.Inaddition,insteadofprohibitingju-jeom,theGSCshouldpromotecampaignsto
Disagree
raiseawarenessofhowourju-jeomcultureshouldgrowinahealthierway.Voluntarychanges
53.47%(293)
wouldleadtohealthierandbetterju-jeom.Therefore,ju-jeomshouldnotbeprohibitedfrom
*()isthenumberof
theUniversitycampus.
respondents.
Whatisyourreasonfor
MaSung-min,DepartmentofGerman‘12
agreement?
I oppose the University’s decision to ban ju-jeom on campus. The campus is not private
?
property and therefore, policies at the University need to be justified. Even though HUFS is
21.21%
?
Undergraduates
(49)
a private university, the ideal of education is realized here and the authorities should not act
72.29%
231
(167)
as if this is their private property. The University cannot ignore the students or it would be
?
distorting the value of the basic ideals and spirit of the university community. Even middle
3.9%(9)
and high schools grant some rights to their students, only restricting others due to their
? 2.6%(6)
?Ju-jeomispartofuniversityculture.
students being minors. All the students who have entered HUFS should be considered as
?Openingju-jeomisachanceforacademic
departmentsand“Dongari”orclubstostrengthen
intellectualswhocanrightfully,wisely,andcollectivelymakegooddecisionsregardingtheir
theunity.
activities. Restraining these rights is violating their legitimacy. The students have the right
Whatisyourreasonfor
toresistapolicythatexcludestheiropinions,meaningthatitisjustifiableforthestudentsto
disagreement?
? 10.74%
go against the University’s decision to prohibit ju-jeom. Violating legitimacy in deciding to
(32)
?4.03%
ban ju-jeom can only be seen as violence. This case of the ju-jeom can be applied to other
(12)
Undergraduates
problems at the University in which the authorities ignore the voices of the students when
?
298
?
23.83%
deciding important university policy. The University needs to acknowledge that the reason
61.41%
(71)
(183)
whystudentsgoagainsttheprohibitionofju-jeomisnotsimplybecausetheycannotdrinkon
thecampusanymore.Evenifitmaybeperceivedastrivial,wethestudentsshouldmakesure
?Thenoiseandtrashfromju-jeomharmthe
theUniversitydoesnotsuppressthestudents’rights.TheGSCshouldbeabletopreventthat.
academicatmosphere.
?Ju-jeominvadesdailylivesofthoselivinginthe
dormitoryandaroundtheschoolcampus.
www.theargus.org

현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.