총 28페이지

22
EyeofTheArgus
Newdigitalnetwork
tiesupHUFSans’tongue
By ChaHyun-jin
EditorofTheArgus
H
UFSconcludeda“CleanCampusCampaign”withtheUniversityNewsNetwork(UNN)onApril20.
This agreement has a goal that the campus will be a cleaner place than before. If this campaign is
fulfilled,postersandplacardswillberemovedandLCDmonitorsandelectricsignswillbeinstalled.
ItseemsthatHUFSansarewelcomingtheupcominginitiatives.However,thereareothervoiceswhichsaythat
the“CleanCampusCampaign”caninfluencestudentssufficientlywithpostersandplacards.
ThecampaignissupportedfinanciallybytheUNN.HUFSisthethirduniversitywhichmadeanagreement
afterChung-AngUniversityandHanyangUniversity.Accordingtothisagreement,LCDmonitorsandelectric
signswillbesetupinmainbuildingsandstreetsofImuncampus.Aftertheelectronicmonitorsareestablished
theywilldelivertheinformationsuchaspublicnoticesofdongarisandtheGeneralStudentCouncil(GSC).
However,contrarytoitsoriginalpurposes,convenienceandcleanness,thecampaigncoulddamagestudents’
rightsseriously.
HUFSadministrationassertsthatthecampaigncouldimproveschool’scircumstancesdiscardingindiscreet
placards, posters and using convenient digital machines. Additionally, they say it is easy to disperse
information.Themostimportantpointisthatitcouldinfringeonthefreedomofexpressionbecauseofvague
associatedstandards.Inschool,therearepostersandplacardsputupforcommercialpurpose.However,mostof
theinformationmaterialsareaboutannouncementsfromtheGSC,institutes,anddongarisofHUFS.Ifthese
materialsareconvertedtodigitalwithoutspecificprovision,itwillsinkstudents’ownvariousexpressionand
theiroriginalgoals.
Ratherdefiningplacardsandpostersasrecklessthings,HUFSadministrationcanrestrictHUFSansfromself-
expression in school. In fact, intentional interference with the posters frequently occurred even though the
freedomofexpressionisafundamentalright.Forexample,aprofessortoredownpostersandevenburntthem
becausehefeltthecontentsinpostersdishonoredhim.
Besides,constraintsonjournalsofHUFSaregettingincreasinglyconstrictive.IncaseoftheOedaeHakbo,
they werent’t able to publish twice this semester. Having some friction with a professor editor about its
contents,theywerebannedfrompublishingthenewspaper.Itisinferablethatsomepolicieswhichweremade
fromthe“CleanCampusCampaign”couldlimitpublicationsviolatingstudents’rightsofexpression.
Likewise, students’ various opinions can be controlled under the university administration. Controlling
students’ voice means that the administration can restrain informative materials, at the same time the view
pointsconflictwiththeadministration.
Whenmanypostersandplacardsareplasteredfromplacetoplaceandnotbeingcrowdedwithcommercial
papersorads,itcanbecalled,“CleanCampus.”However,tomanageeveryposterandplacardisdamagingthe
student’basicright.Whatthemosturgentfortheadministrationistopreparemoreconcreteconditions.
bellina_cha@hufs.ac.kr
www.theargus.org

현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.