총 36페이지

20 CoverStory
andGSCmembers.ThedemandsanddiscussionsthattheschoolreferstoareonlybetweenthedeanofStudent
Affair and the president of GSC. The Argus asked some other members of the GSC about the demands for an
improvementschemefromtheschoolonOct.16,buttheydidnotknowaboutit.“Wearenotfullyawareofthe
contentsofthemeetingbetweentheGSCpresidentandthedean,butweknowthattheschoolhasneverreally
demandedascheme,”saidamemberofGSC.
GSCattemptstoarousepublicopinionagainstschool
The only way for students to know what is really happening between the GSC and the school is through the
papersandarticlesthattheGSCprovides.However,thereissomeinformationwhichisirrelevant.
On Oct. 8, in the emergency CSC meeting proposal, it began by stating that the school had announced the
declaration on Sept. 24 and described it as “an act which goes beyond just prohibiting ju-jeom and drinking
alcohol in school but is threatening student’s autonomous activities.” However, the declaration from the school
does not prohibit drinking alcohol on the campus, although there were also controversies over whether it is
appropriatetodrinkattheschoolornot.
In the same CSC proposal, it also says that the school is not providing money for the GSC to prepare for the
schoolfestival,Daedongje.However,thisisnotrelevanttothecaseofju-jeom,buttheschoolbudget.Itistrue
thattheschoolhasreducedthebudgetforGSCinthebeginningwithoutmentioningittothemandGSCspenta
lotofmoneyduringthefirstsemesterleavinglittleforthesecondsemester.
ThepleafromtheGSConOct.9mentionsthepre-announcementoflegislationintherevisedNationalHealth
PromotionActfromtheMinistryofHealthandWelfare.Therevisedplanincludestheprohibitionofdrinkingin
publicplacessuchasuniversitycampuses.TheGSCinsiststhattheschoolhasdeclaredsuchaprohibitiononthe
pretextofthisrevisioneventhoughitisnotguaranteedthatthelawwillcomeintoeffect.However,accordingto
thedeanofStudentAffairs,theschool’sdecisionisbasedsolelyonthedamageju-jeomhavecaused.Ithasbeen
recognizedasaproblemforalongtimesotheschoolwantedtoreducethedamage.
Substantivesolutionisnotthepriority
The GSC is responsible for dealing with any inconveniences students suffer in school
lifeandhavetolistenandfindsolutionsandwaystoimprovecampuslife.However,
becausetheyfocusedsomuchontheirrightofautonomy,theyhaveusedju-jeom
asawaytoexpresstheirrights.Thishasdelayedimprovingtheju-jeomculture.
The GSC did not reflect all 8000 students’ opinions and only propagated
theirstancetoopposetheschool.Itwasaftersometimehadpassed,onOct
17 that the GSC started to give out surveys to students. On Oct. 19, they
alsoconductedahearingbutbecausetheysetthedaterightbeforethemid-
termexamanddidnotpublicizeitenough,therewerenotmanystudentsin
attendance. On Hufslife, a student insisted that if other problems relating to
autonomous rights are so important, the GSC should focus on those points
insteadoftryingtomakeju-jeompartoftheirpropaganda.“TheGSCkeeps
arguing that the biggest problem here is the fact that the school declared
unilaterally. However, the GSC acts as if they are representing all students
withtheiropinions,”saidthestudent.
Even though the problem was apparent, the GSC was slow in reacting to
thecomplaints.Theschoolandstudentswerebothwaitingforsomesolution
toju-jeombutithasonlybeenrecentlythattheGSCactuallyworkedonthe
solutionsandwaystoreducethedamage.“TheGSCwasawareofthisissue
www.theargus.org

현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.