총 44페이지

Spotlight at HUFS
numerous announcements. Even if a student makes a mistake,
Interviewwiththepartiesinvolved
an announcement that puts an individual student under such
scrutiny is a wrongful action. I have heard that other students
InterviewwithStudentP’sdepartmentstudentcouncil
Thestudentcouncilthinksitunfortunatethatsuchasituation
have similar experiences regarding Professor J. I hope
hashappened.Thereleaseofpersonaldetails,personalasking
HUFSanssympathizeandsharetheirangerwithmeoverthis.
a student to drop a course, and an e-mail containing threats
Lastly, Professor J released enough information to piece
has clearly threatened a course-taker’s right to education. We
together the personal details of a student. Unilaterally
believethatthiscaserootsfromthelackofunderstandingand
publicizing a private dispute is unacceptable and the professor
communicationbetweentheprofessorsandstudentsduringthe
needstoclarifyhispositionoverthismatter.
currentpandemiccrisis.
Asanorganizationthatrepresentsthestudents,
InterviewwithanofficialoftheStudentAffairsTeam
wearetryingourutmosttogetapublicapology
*ThisinterviewwasheldonSept.15.
for the student concerned. Moreover, we
First, no concrete thing can be said. There are no similar
plan to obtain confirmation from the HUFS
precedents, so it is even more difficult to say anything. Up
administration and the offices concerned that
to this point, there were none regarding a personal dispute
▲ Statement
such situations will not repeat in the future. In
between a professor and a student. Moreover, in my time at
of the P’s
department
this regard, we have set procedures that will
HUFS, there was no clash between a student and a professor
s t u d e n t
bringforthappropriatemeasures.
thatcameunderthespotlightinthismanner.Forthisreason,it
council
isdifficulttopredictwhatexactlywillhappen.However,atthis
point, the complaints file can be deemed rather subjective in
InterviewwithStudentP
IwouldliketofirstadmittothecriticismIwasemotionalin
nature.Itismyopinionthatnotallofthestudent’srequestswill
my response to the professor’s actions. However, I do believe
beaccepted.Inpreviouscases,therewasapersonalagreement
that the professor’s initial responses were inappropriate, and
betweenthestudentandprofessorwhichledtoclosure,orthere
I felt that his temperamental and insincere response was
wasdisciplinaryactionagainsttheprofessor.
a problem. It was the best I could do in a situation where
Thiscasewillproceedasfollows:thefilingofthecomplaint,
students,includingmyself,werenotrespected.
discussion over the complaint by the persons in charge
Nevertheless, for those interested in the issue, I would like
including the dean of Student Affairs, and any possible
HUFSanstofocusontheessenceofthiscase.Theprofessordid
measures. Currently, the Student Affairs Team and, in
not live up to his duty. Students have a right to ask a question
representationofStudentP,P’sdepartmentstudentcouncil,has
and get an answer because they pay tuition for the education
heldface-to-facediscussions.Thereisnothingconfirmedasof
they receive. The course is scheduled at 1:30 P.M. on Fridays.
now,andwedonothavetheopinionsofallpartiesinvolved,so
To establish an e-Class a mere thirty minutes before that, and
wecannotgiveyouasolidanswer.
thenreleaseaone-wayannouncementtellingthestudentsthata
lecturewillbeuponSaturdayatteninthemorningiswrong.
*The Argus sent an e-mail to Professor J, but did not
Also, Professor J inflicted mental distress through his
receiveareply.
There are many opinions regarding the incident. Some say the student overreacted, while others say the professor’s
temperamental reaction was the problem. The situation would have not occurred had both sides tried to be more
understanding.Thatis,thereismoreweightinhowtheproblemcametoberatherthanhowtheincidentplayedout.Infact,
duringthediscussionsbetweenthestudentcouncilandthedeanofStudentAffairs,itwassaidthatdecipheringandtaking
intoaccounteachstatementintheexchangebetweentheprofessorandstudentisanexhaustingprocess.Therearenoclear
criteria.
StudentP’sdepartmentstudentcouncilfocusedontheprocess.AproblemwasposedoverhowStudentPwasadvisedto
drop the class; a problem was also posed over how Student P’s personal detail could be pieced together from the e-Class
notices.Throughthisincident,TheArgushopesthatstudentsrealizethattheyhavearighttotheeducationforwhichthey
paytuitionandexpresstheirdiscomfortsshouldanyarise.TheArgusfurtherhopesthatroadstomorecommunicationwill
bepavedbetweenstudentsandprofessorsduringthisstill-unbelievableCOVID-19reality.
hk9816@hufs.ac.kr
chhwpark@hufs.ac.kr
10
www.theargus.org

현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.